In the world of personal finance, few topics stir as much interest and debate as inheritance tax (IHT). Given its significant impact on estate planning and wealth transfer, the Autumn Statement 2023 was eagerly anticipated, with many expecting major reforms to IHT. However, the Chancellor of the Exchequer’s decision to leave IHT untouched has been a notable point of discussion.
The Status Quo Continues
Contrary to widespread speculation and the hopes of many, the Autumn Statement did not bring any changes to IHT. This decision was seen as a potential vote winner for next year’s election, leading to suggestions that any favourable changes, particularly for the wealthier segments of society, might be introduced in the upcoming Spring. However, the Autumn Statement focused instead on other areas, leaving the IHT regime as it is.
Inheritance tax has long been considered one of Britain’s most disliked taxes. The expectation was that Jeremy Hunt might announce cuts or even an abolition of IHT, a move that would have been both popular with voters and not overly costly for the Exchequer, estimated at around £6 billion. Yet, the Chancellor chose not to tread this path, perhaps saving potential reforms for the 2024 Spring Budget to maximise impact ahead of the General Election.
The Call for Reform
Personally, I express some disappointment over the lack of IHT review, as the current regime is overly complex. The need for a simpler, fairer, and more effective system is evident. It is analomous that the tax on death is so high (at 40%) but the tax on most lifetime gifts is zero. Some suggested reforms include reducing the 40% fixed rate, removing certain reliefs, and abolishing potentially exempt transfers. These changes could simplify the system, reducing opportunities for avoidance and abuse.
Economic Implications and Future Prospects
Despite no changes to IHT, the Autumn Statement revealed that IHT receipts increased again, with a 12% rise in the first seven months of the 2023/24 Financial Year compared to the previous year. This increase suggests a growing significance of IHT in the UK’s fiscal landscape.
Moreover, the Office for Budget Responsibility has increased its estimates for IHT for the next six years, predicting that it will bring in £47.1 billion compared to the earlier estimate of £45 billion. This upward revision underscores the growing fiscal importance of IHT.
The decision to leave IHT untouched is seen as a missed opportunity. With trillions of pounds expected to be transferred between estates in the coming decades, a more engaging and less discouraging system is needed for effective planning.
Conclusion
The decision to maintain the status quo with IHT in the 2023 Autumn Statement reflects a cautious approach by the government, possibly influenced by wider economic considerations and electoral strategies. While it leaves individuals and families grappling with the complexities of the existing IHT system, it also opens up possibilities for significant reforms in the near future (and may be part of a manifesto).
For now, the focus turns to the Spring Budget of 2024, where changes to IHT, if any, may play a crucial role in shaping the fiscal landscape and influencing the electorate ahead of the General Election.
References and further reading
